Understanding Medals
- the wine wench

- Sep 24, 2020
- 2 min read
Updated: Nov 9, 2020

Mostly when we go looking for wine, whether it’s in-store or online, we go for brands we know, right? But what happens when you can’t see anything familiar? What other factors can you take into account to help you choose well?
How about… medals? No doubt you’ve seen bottles sporting these shiny accolades – Bronze, Silver, Gold, Double Gold & Trophy. But what do they mean, who awards them, and do they actually indicate good wine?
In Australia, we have a 20-point wine show judging system. The wines are tasted blind by industry experts, meaning they don’t know anything about the wine itself except the category. The judges award points out of 3 for appearance, 7 for the nose and 10 for the palate. Scores are then added, and medals are awarded as follows:
Gold: 18.5 to 20 – an exceptional wine
Silver: 17 to 18 – an extremely good wine
Bronze: 15.5 to 16.5 – a good wine
In different parts of the world, and also a few parts of Australia, some wine critics use the 100-point system. Scoring for this system goes like this:
100 – 95 is equivalent to a Gold medal
94 – 90 is equivalent to a Silver medal
89 – 85 is equivalent to a Bronze medal
This is the system our most renowned wine critic uses - James Halliday (although his range goes down to 75). This ‘American’ rating system is becoming increasingly popular with Aussie winemakers, so you might see it more and more.

A Double Gold medal is a bit of a rarity, and not necessarily a guarantee at a wine show. A Double Gold is awarded when all the judges unanimously agree that a wine deserves a Gold medal.
A Trophy is the most prestigious award. Where many medals can be awarded throughout the year, only one of each Trophy is awarded each year, picked from among the Gold-winning wines of the show.
Top tip: At the end of all this, there is one BIG thing to keep in mind – if a wine doesn’t have a medal, it certainly doesn’t mean it isn’t good! Many, many wines, even from some of the best producers, may not be entered into shows at all.

So medals and points can definitely help you find a decent wine if you’re stuck for inspiration! BUT they’re not the be all and end all – on the whole, they indicate that someone has tried this wine and they liked it enough to give it a decent score. At the end of the day, wine is super subjective, and what you like is probably going to be different from what your friend, neighbour or high school crush likes. And that’s okay!
Feel free to share this with your fellow wine lovers! Link below.




The discussion around wine medals raises intriguing points about how we assess quality. While awards like Gold and Silver may enhance perception, they can create biases. The mention of Royal Reels https://degenroyale.com/ highlights a trend where distinction can stem from curated experiences rather than numerical scores. Ultimately, personal taste prevails, reminding us that subjective preferences shape our choices in wine.
The discussion on wine medals raises intriguing points about subjectivity in taste. While awards like those given by Leon are certainly helpful indicators, they don't fully encapsulate the wine's quality or appeal to individual preferences. Relying solely on such metrics can limit the discovery of unique wines that haven't received recognition yet. This highlights the importance of personal exploration in the world of wine.
The discussion on wine awards and scoring systems reveals much about consumer behavior and decision-making. While medals like Gold and Silver can guide choices, they don't necessarily equate to personal taste or quality. It's intriguing how a system like Fast Payout fatbastardpies.co.nz can influence perceptions, yet individual preferences ultimately define what is truly enjoyable. Understanding this can enhance our wine selection process.
It appears that the level of precision is maintained across all sections. Key conclusions trace directly back to the source material. The website grounds the analysis in a broader informational setting. Behavioural indicators are mapped against platform-level engagement data.